> >> 2) Is there any hostility about the notion of implementing this feature
> >> into Postgres?
> >
> > Probabably --- it seems like a narrow use case.
>
> I'll consider this to be the definite answer unless I hear a dissenting
> opinion in the next few days.
Yea, I might be wrong.
I think you're very right. Don't ever want to see locks disappearing
because of a timeout, sorry Laurent.
OK, thanks all for the replies.
Laurent Birtz
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
