Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 04:59:44PM +0200, Andreas Kretschmer wrote: > > Julius Tuskenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > I have a question concerning performance. One of my queries take a long > > > to execute. I tried to do "explain analyse" and I see that the > > > sequential scan is being used, although I have indexes set on columns > > > that are used in joins. The question is - WHY, and how to change that > > > behavior??? > > > > Try to create an index on apsilankymai.sas_id > > In the DDL that Julius posted apsilankymai doesn't have an sas_id > column. > > The join is on apsilankymai.aps_saskaita = b_saskaita.sas_id. Both > columns have an index: b_saskaita.sas_id is a primary key so it > should have an index implicitly, and apsilankymai.aps_saskaita has
Right, my mistake. Andreas -- Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) "If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknown) Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889° -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
