Gregory Stark wrote:
REINDEX scans the table precisely once and sorts it.
For the bloat, as opposed to corruption, case - what information is needed from the table that is not in the old index? Why would a sequential read of the old index alone (then some processing) not suffice? Thanks, Jeremy Harris -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
