Is there a good reason to NOT store the year month and day as a date instead of this way?
I can think of a lot of very good reasons to store it as a date, not a lot of reasons to store them broken apart. On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 4:51 AM, jrivero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, i need help for a query. I have three fields, year, month and day > into table and need join and update another field named date on same > table. > > My problem is not that make update query. > > With this query have the value of the update: >> select year || '-' || month || '-' || day || ' 01:00:00' as newdate from >> table > > but this another query not have correct syntax... >> update table set date=(select year || '-' || month || '-' || day || ' >> 01:00:00' as newdate from table) > > Regards, > Jordi > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general > -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
