Daniel Schuchardt wrote:
Tino Wildenhain schrieb:
RETURN extract(year FROM $1)*100+extract(month FROM $1)-1;
was too clean and easy? ;))
Looks like a good oportunity to clean up your code before anything
unexpected happens :-)
Cheers
T.
LOL. Yes I don't like such easy things :-P
> RAISE NOTICE "error during validation % :",
'ks:"'||ks||'"@"'||loopdate||'"'; (here LoopDate is a DateTime)
You know you can use more than one % in a raise and it will take care of
the data types?
create function atest() returns integer as $$
declare
ks integer;
loopdate timestamp;
begin
ks := 3;
loopdate := now();
raise notice 'blah ks:[EMAIL PROTECTED]', ks, loopdate;
return 1;
end;
$$ language plpgsql;
postgres=# select atest();
NOTICE: blah ks:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09:58:55.812
atest
-------
1
(1 row)
klint.
--
Klint Gore
Database Manager
Sheep CRC
A.G.B.U.
University of New England
Armidale NSW 2350
Ph: 02 6773 3789
Fax: 02 6773 3266
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
