Mike Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My question, then, is if it considered acceptable practice to, instead > of having field_name in the secondary table, have a foreign key > reference back to the field definition in the meta-data.
If you mean a foreign key reference into the system catalogs, we don't support that :-( regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general