Hello
http://www.postgresql.at/english/pr_cybercluster_e.html
didn't test it myself though
Sincerely
Dragan
Rob Collins wrote:
Hello Dimitri
To clarify the requirement: much like you, we're not looking for
synchronous replication, which would be too slow. The branches and
central server can be different for about 5 to 10 minutes. But the
branches need to be able to function independently if the network or
central goes down. Londiste looks interesting, though the
documentation seems a bit sparse. Is it really that simple to set up,
or is there a fair amount of trial and error in the setup process?
Best wishes
Rob
On 16/04/2008, *Dimitri Fontaine* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi,
Le mercredi 16 avril 2008, Rob Collins a écrit :
> There is one central server with 19 branches. Some tables need
to replicate
> from the central server to the branches. Other tables are
centralised from
> the branches into one totalling table at the centre. A few
tables need to
> replicate in both directions.
I'm working on some projects here with this very need (and same
scale), and I
plan to use londiste (master/slaves asynchronous solution) replication
solution, which I already use in production on some other project.
The fact is that we want the "branches" to still be fully
available in case of
network or central server failure, so we don't buy into synchronous
replication; which is not available yet into PostgreSQL as far as
I know,
even if one of the basics building-block alternatives is provided
into -core,
namely Two Phase Commit.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/sql-prepare-transaction.html
You'll find londiste documentation at both following places, the
latter is
up-to-date with last 2.1.6 release, the former I'm not sure about it.
http://skytools.projects.postgresql.org/doc/
http://pgsql.tapoueh.org/skytools/
Hope this helps, regards,
--
dim
