Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just thought I'd report it here in case it wasn't supposed to > happen, but from what you say, it seems like it's a "feature".
Well, it's more of a historical hangover. Personally I'd not have
much problem with breaking backward compatibility on this point.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
