"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanks. I had another concern about VACUUM not reporting DEAD line > pointers (please see up thread). Any comments on that ?
If you want to work on that, go ahead, but I wanted it separate because I didn't think it merited back-patching. It's strictly cosmetic in terms of being about what VACUUM VERBOSE prints, no? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general