On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, mark wrote:
>
> current settings all default
> > > #checkpoint_segments = 3
> > > #checkpoint_timeout = 5min
> > > #checkpoint_completion_target = 0.5
> > > #checkpoint_warning = 30s
> > >
> >
> > this is what I have on pg_stat_bgwriter ; how much should I increase
> > checkpoint_segment & checkpoint_completion_target to? thanks a lot!
> >
> > postgres=# select * from pg_stat_bgwriter;
> > checkpoints_timed | checkpoints_req | buffers_checkpoint | buffers_clean
> > |
> > 42 | 1051 | 8035125 | 21954
> > |
> > maxwritten_clean | buffers_backend | buffers_alloc
> > 42 | 241519 | 10394696
> >
>
> That means that 96% of the time, you are hitting a checkpoint because of
> activity in less than 5 minutes after the previous one. And 97% of the
> dirty buffers written out are being done by the checkpoint process. Your
> system is spending its entire life doing checkpoint work and it's no wonder
> response time is slow quite regularly.
this really clear! Thannks!!
> Increasing checkpoint_segments uses up more disk space for the WAL files
> and increases the amount of time it will take to recover from a crash. If
> neither of those two things matter to you, you can easily bump that
> parameter up to 100 or more. I'd suggest starting with an order of
> magnitude change and increase from 3 to 30. You have to restart the server
> to make that change stick. It's impossible to predict how much that will
> change your situation, to know if that's enough or you really need to
> increase it further.
>
Based on what Tomasz suggested a day ago, I had changed settings to
checkpoint_segments = 16
checkpoint_timeout = 20min
checkpoint_completion_target = 0.8
and this seems to have improved performance significantly... data from
almost 24 hours
postgres=# select * from pg_stat_bgwriter;
checkpoints_timed | checkpoints_req | buffers_checkpoint | buffers_clean |
maxwritten_clean | buffers_backend | buffers_alloc
-------------------+-----------------+--------------------+---------------+------------------+-----------------+---------------
21 | 46 | 2218439 | 34158
| 145 | 60447 | 2707259
but i still do get statements that take over 2 or 3 seconds to execute
sometimes... should I increase checkpoint_segments to 30 now? Should I
change checkpoint_timeout & checkpoint_completion_target too??
i am fine with both WAL disk usage increasing and increase in time to
recover from crash...
