At 10:25a -0400 on Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Zdeněk Kotala wrote: > And after long discussion on patches and hackers list we have made a > decision than we need input from wide audience. This is a reason why > I prepare following surveys.
1. b 2. b 3. b (but whichever, just be consistent) 4. b & c I don't care, really. The value of pg_* is that it'd obvious it's Postgres related, it'd be consistent with at least two other APIs I already know, it'd be easy for noobs to find with "pg_<tab><tab>", and leaves room in a cooperative sense with other DBs that might eventually want to do something similar. That said I'm with Sam Mason: it's a wash if I use SQL or them. However, they're very nice for beginners, and getting beginners to start with a project is 3/4ths the battle in'nit? Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
