On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:17:10 -0500 "Adam Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The short answer is that Adam's statement is wrong, or at least > > misleading. > > Sorry Tom, I wasn't trying to do either. Joshua Drake (who I > understand to be a reliable source of postgresql information) said > that applying a sequence to a column after creation created issues, > versus using the serial type which did not. Right but as Tom reminded me, the behavior I was referring to was pre 8.3 and in (I believe) it was 8.2 we introduced alter sequence options to fix the problem. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
