On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:29:07AM +0100, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:08:27 -0400 > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 14/03/2008, rrahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I see Mysql bosting for Google,Yahoo, Alcatel...... > > >> What about Postgres the list is not that impressive. > > > > > What then? Could it be marketing or the sad results of a > > > avalanche effect? Geee, there's a thought. > > > > Marketing. Remember that MySQL AB have a strong financial > > incentive to make organized efforts to locate and publicize > > impressive-sounding users of MySQL. (I've heard rumors they even > > give licensing discounts to companies that will let their names be > > used like that.) > > > > There is no comparable effort happening on the Postgres side. > > There are plenty of impressive users of PG too, but they don't have > > to talk about it. > > I still find impressing that Google uses MySQL... I can guess why,
What makes you so sure Google don't use PostgreSQL *as well*? (hint: we don't force them to tell you about it...) //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
