"Obe, Regina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It would be really nice if this worked with OR as well. Is it just much > harder to deal with the > OR case in the planner or was there some other reason why the OR case > was left out?
Nobody's really made a case why we should have the planner expend cycles
on that.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
