> > That's an excellent point, especially considering that *sequences* use > > an integer to hold their max_value, which is by default 2,147,483,647. > > You cannot go larger than that, either. I guess it's constrained to be > > positive. So OIDs give you more potential unique values than sequences, > > far as I can tell. What about postgres' int8 type which holds up to +/- 9 billion billion or something. - Andrew
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: 4 billion record limit? Keith G. Murphy
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: 4 billion record limit? Ross J. Reedstrom
- Andrew Snow