Henrik Zagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Usually I can see what is wrong with queries but I can't figure out  
> why this query is slow.

Seems the main problem is here:

>                      ->  Bitmap Index Scan on tbl_archive_idx1   
> (cost=0.00..1150.47 rows=8 width=0) (actual time=1505.456..1505.456  
> rows=86053 loops=16)
>                            Index Cond: (tbl_share.pk_share_id =  
> tbl_archive.fk_share_id)

Why is this scan finding so many more rows than the planner expects?
Perhaps increasing the stats targets on these columns would help it
make a better estimate.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to