"Sander Steffann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > From: "Harald Fuchs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Forget inet. Check out http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ip4r/ and be happy.
> I would be happy if it would support IPv6 :-) Are there plans to make ip6r
> or something like that?
What's the point? You might as well use the regular inet type if you
need to handle ipv6.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
