Em Thursday 18 October 2007 01:44:33 Bret Schuhmacher escreveu:
>
> Thanks for the reply, Tom. I was thinking I could have my remote
> process send a message back to PG via XMLBlaster, too. XMLBlaster is
> a MOM-like message-queuing app that guarantees delivery to
> subscribers. (www.xmlblaster.org). The problem, as you stated,
> though, is transactional integrity :-(. Hmmm, I'll see about the
> to-do queue idea.
You can try implementing a queue, Bret. Make it a FIFO queue and poll from it
regularly. Ten make your transaction insert a record on that queue and take
your action based on that.
A table as simple as:
id SERIAL, -- you can have a routine to
reset this when empty
table TEXT, -- includes schema
primary_key TEXT -- to allow for numeric and text PKs
would allow you to retrieve the row that has been changed and take your action
based on that.
--
Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
