Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > "Scott Marlowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 10/10/07, Guilherme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If I insert a sequence later on table creation with alter table, drop > >> table cascade simply doesn't drop this sequence even when I specify > >> CASCADE. > > > This is normal. > > In 8.2 and up you can use ALTER SEQUENCE ... OWNED BY ... to establish a > link that will make a manually created sequence go away when its "owner" > column is dropped. In 8.1 that aspect of SERIAL is hidden magic :-(
Really no way to recognize with pg_* or information_schema.* ? I can't believe this, but i don't know a way... Andreas -- Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds) "If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly." (unknow) Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe. N 51.05082°, E 13.56889° ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly