On Oct 2, 3:14 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeff Davis) wrote:
> A "wakeup call" might be justified if:
> (1) it's on -advocacy (after all, the primary threat in his email is
> that we would lose users...)
> (2) it's good advocacy, i.e. not rude, insulting, demanding, or vulgar
>
Good point, I apologize for posting it in the wrong group, I didn't
notice the advocacy group.
And that's the only thing I apologize for. It's good advocacy.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
