On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 23:58 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
> It keeps the same information in more than one place. Consider:
>
> 1
> 1.1
> 1.1.1
>
> Note that all three records contain the root's id of "1". If you want to
> reparent 1.1 to be 2.1 you have to know that all its children also need to be
> reparented as well.
Aren't there still some update anomolies with any schema representing a
DAG?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
