Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is silly. Have you forgotten that the max number of columns is
>> constrained to 1600 on the backend side?
> Uh, this is the number of returned rows, right? How does this relate to
> columns?
Duh, brain fade on my part, sorry. Still, I suspect the return type of
PQntuples would be the very least of the changes we'd need to make to
support resultsets > 2G rows. And I would not advise changing it to an
unsigned type, since that could cause hard-to-find breakage in
comparison logic in applications.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
