Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> trax=# explain analyze select * from client_search_id_func(62) left join
> tblsearch_selections ON search_id = 62 and user_id = 'RF' and
> ((selected_value = clientno and selection_type = 'client') or (selected_value
> = contactno and selection_type = 'contact'));
I don't think you're going to get anywhere until you get rid of the
OR-of-ANDs join condition; the OR defeats using any reasonably
intelligent join method such as a merge or hash join. You should
redesign the set-returning function to emit a representation that
matches the table you want to search, or perhaps rethink the table's
representation.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org/
