Greg Smith wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Tyson Lloyd Thwaites wrote:
It looks like it would be best if we re-worked our transactions and
controlled them manually for the portions that need it.
I am glad you have moved so quickly through grief and into acceptance.
Heh heh - maybe I've had good councellors...
It is still a possible point of confusion, but I am starting to think
that pgsql has it right, and mssql has it wrong. (I feel betrayed!)
This issue probably deserves a prominant place in the FAQ!
In whose FAQ? Would need more details about what MS-SQL is doing
badly to cover it on this side of things. There's been some
collecting of trivia in that category lately, haven't gotten to issues
with their product much so far.
Pgs... like a warning that you can't do this;
begin
insert 1 --works
insert 2 --fails
commit
row 1 will exist in db (yes, no kidding). This will not work in pg,
which I now see is obviously correct.
--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
--
Tyson Lloyd Thwaites
Lead Software Developer
Allianza Services Pty Ltd
M: 0404 456 858
P: (+618) 8232 5525
F: (+618) 8232 8252
W: www.allianza.com.au
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
