RE: [GENERAL] boolean isn't boolean?

[Peter Eisentraut]

Marc Britten writes:

> language-lawyer version.. you used the wrong version of the lang, the docs
> say it complies to SQL3, which has completely different wording than SQL99

SQL3 isn't a standard, the term used to be employed to mean "the potential
successor to ISO/IEC 9075:1992", which turned out to be ISO/IEC 9075:1999,
which is what I quoted.


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden