Re: [GENERAL] int8 and hash index

[Tom Lane]

"Philip Poles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm having some trouble using a hash index on an INT8 field in
> postgres7.0(release):

Looks like we don't have a hash function defined for int8 :-(.
This is going to have to stay broken until 7.1, given our rule
against changing system catalogs for subreleases.  Sorry.

Just counting entries, that may not be the only type that has
entries in pg_amop but not pg_amproc.  I feel another oprsanity
regression-test check coming on...

                        regards, tom lane