> > > When we are sure all platforms support 64-bit int's, we will move in > > that direction. > > Sorry if this is a stupid question, but couldn't you fairly easily make it > an option at compile time? To use either 32 or 64 bit OID's. > (And, less importantly, for sequences) Well, we could but then all the API would change, and internally there would be changes. No one has really asked for it vs. the work in doing it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- [GENERAL] unique row identifier data type exhausted . . . Frank Joerdens
- RE: [GENERAL] unique row identifier data type exhauste... Andrew Snow
- Re: [GENERAL] unique row identifier data type exha... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [GENERAL] unique row identifier data type ... Andrew Snow
- RE: [GENERAL] unique row identifier data t... Bruce Momjian
- RE: [GENERAL] unique row identifier data t... Tom Cook
- RE: [GENERAL] unique row identifier d... Andrew Snow
- Re: [GENERAL] unique row identifi... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] unique row identifier data type exhauste... Jurgen Defurne
- RE: [GENERAL] unique row identifier data type exhauste... Franck Martin