At 10:27 PM 12/25/99, Bruce Momjian wrote: >[snip] > > Plug-in Oracle 7 compatibility. > >I believe we are adding Oracle compatibility as possible. We are >working on write-ahead log, long tuples, foreign keys, and outer joins. >Anything else? Replication would be nice, or some other form of clustering so the load can be easily split among multiple PostGres servers. My personal pet peeves are the difficulty of the backup/restore process (well, it's not really difficult, it just takes a while) and the 8k query limit. Also, the ability to restrict CREATE [ TABLE | INDEX | SEQUENCE ...] would be nice. ************
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of Postgr... Ed Loehr
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Marten Feldtmann
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Clark C. Evans
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Clark C. Evans
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL john huttley
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Adriaan Joubert
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Howie
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Karel Zak - Zakkr
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Charles Tassell
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Lamar Owen
- PostgreSQL Portable Runtime (was Re: [GENERAL] Future of... Robert
- PostgreSQL Portable Runtime (was Re: [GENERAL] Future of... Robert
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Diana Eichert