I think you missed this rather critical bit on the Github, Daniel .... "Post-August 28th, 2025 - For development purposes, community-tier users are restricted to pulling only the most recent ‘latest’ tags of the limited community-tier subset of container images. - Production users should subscribe to Bitnami Secure Images for full version support"
12 Aug 2025, 11:35 by dan...@yesql.se: >> On 11 Aug 2025, at 17:49, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote: >> On 8/11/25 08:33, Smith wrote: >> >>> Not sure where to post this but the Postgres team should consider pulling >>> the promotion for Bitnami on the downloads page. >>> See: >>> https://github.com/bitnami/charts/issues/35164 >>> > > Reading that doesn't make it obvious that we should remove Bitnami from the > page, they are still offering (what they now call hardened images) postgresql: > > https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnamisecure/postgresql > > Looking at their catalog they are up to date with the most recent 16 minor > release but no 17 version AFAICT. > > https://app-catalog.vmware.com/bitnami/apps/33ff5603-01b2-4310-a541-0d24b516cb56 > > Keeping it on the other hand opens the question of why we aren't linking to > other similar distributions and operators. > >> Yeah, going here: >> https://bitnami.com/tag/postgresql >> gets a 404 page. >> > > Right, that clearly needs to be fixed. > > -- > Daniel Gustafsson > > >
