On 7/30/25 08:47, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 5:23 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 7/30/25 04:37, Dominique Devienne wrote:
Are there special consideration I'm unaware of, regarding SET ROLE
inside routines?
What is the ROLE that defined the function?
A 3rd role. But does it matter? Given that this is in SECURITY INVOKER function?
My mistake, a BC(Before Coffee) issue.
The function and the table belong to yet another role.
And when we enter the function, we're yet another one (obviously with
USAGE+EXECUTE, since could call it).
But once we SET LOCAL ROLE, the effective permissions used should be
for :OWNER1 and the inherited :SOWNER.
Could this be a search_path and/or naming issue, where the table
SchemaMapping appears in more then one schema or different name case?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
