@Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> If you pre-create the data directory with the appropriate permissions, what keeps you from giving ownership to the correct user too?
Our NFS server is not a regular linux based server, it's on zOS (Mainframes) with AT-TLS security enabled, hence it doesn't allow changing of ownership. Basically, we have tried everything we could to change the directory ownership to match with the postgres user and that as of now looks impossible, unless we make changes in the environment. To summarize*, we are not able to change the ownership of the data directory * *due to the Mainframe NFS server limitations when enabled with AT-TLS security * *Hence we wanted to check if bypassing this check is ok if it could be assured * *that only the postgres user can write here (NFS-AT-TLS ensures that). * I wouldn't get into details of explaining why changing ownership is not possible, as that would take this discussion to another context, hence avoiding. Thanks in advance On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 9:18 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > On Wed, 2025-07-16 at 18:54 +0530, Amol Inamdar wrote: > > I would like to rephrase the question a little bit, below is how our > setup going to be > > 1. NFS mount point is for /nfs-mount/postgres (and permissions locked > down so > > that Postgres cannot create directories in here) > > 2. Postgres data directory is /nfs-mount/postgres/db > > 3. With secured NFS + AT-TLS setup Postgres will be able to write to > data directory > > but not parent dir, however the file ownership information > Postgres sees from the > > stat() call will not match the Postgres user in the container > (even though the > > AT-TLS strict access control will ensure only the Posgres user can > read/write to > > this directory) > > Considering the above scenario/setup, what is the danger of removing the > ownership check > > in miscinit.c checkDataDir() function ? > > The danger is that somebody else than the PostgreSQL user has permissions > on > the data directory. You will argue that that somebody is root, and root > has > these permissions anyway. > > But there is another reason why PostgreSQL insists that the PostgreSQL user > owns the data directory: at startup, the postmaster checks if the data > directory belongs to the current user and fails if not. This is a > protection > against starting the postmaster with the wrong user. > > There are certainly ways to do it differently, but I'd argue that they > would > be more complicated, and the current simple solution is robust. > > If you pre-create the data directory with the appropriate permissions, > what keeps you from giving ownership to the correct user too? > > Yours, > Laurenz Albe > -- -regards Amol
