On 6/19/25 07:54, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 4:18 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
On 6/19/25 06:09, Dominique Devienne wrote:
Hi. Little mystery we don't understand. v17.
Does 'all' include the public schema?
No. We don't touch `public` at all, beside pgcrypto ending up inside it.
Of course, the DB owner role was not dropped. Can't in fact.
Somehow, the pgcrypto extension has disappeared, as side-effects of the drops.
Was it in fact installed in the public schema?
Sure was. It's my own command, but good enough. --DD
D:\>ppg -c my17 -d dd_v168a database_ --extensions
Connected OK (postgresql://ddevienne@localhost:5417/dd_v168a)
=======================================================
| Name | Version | Owner | Schema |
=======================================================
| pgcrypto | 1.3 | "Acme-DBA:000ik2" | public |
| plpgsql | 1.0 | postgres | pg_catalog |
=======================================================
2 installed extensions (out of 61)
Which runs
SELECT extname, extversion,
extowner::regrole::text as owner,
extnamespace::regnamespace::text as "schema"
FROM pg_extension
ORDER BY 1
After you run the DROP commands the above query does not return
pgcrypto, correct?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
