We got it from pgdg repository.

Here is the output of pg_config is below.  We have been struggling to get a 
stack trace, however – since we couldn’t reproduce it with a vanilla 
installation and neither could you – we determined it must be something 
specific to our environment.   Turns out when pg_show_plan is in the 
shared_preload_libraries then we get a segmentation fault.  I checked the 
github repo from cybertec and surprised there have been no reported issues with 
it.  I will be posting there shortly.

BINDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/bin
DOCDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/doc
HTMLDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/doc/html
INCLUDEDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/include
PKGINCLUDEDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/include
INCLUDEDIR-SERVER = /usr/pgsql-16/include/server
LIBDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/lib
PKGLIBDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/lib
LOCALEDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/share/locale
MANDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/share/man
SHAREDIR = /usr/pgsql-16/share
SYSCONFDIR = /etc/sysconfig/pgsql
PGXS = /usr/pgsql-16/lib/pgxs/src/makefiles/pgxs.mk
CONFIGURE =  '--enable-rpath' '--prefix=/usr/pgsql-16' 
'--includedir=/usr/pgsql-16/include' '--mandir=/usr/pgsql-16/share/man' 
'--datadir=/usr/pgsql-16/share' '--libdir=/usr/pgsql-16/lib' '--with-lz4' 
'--with-zstd' '--enable-tap-tests' '--with-icu' '--with-llvm' '--with-perl' 
'--with-python' '--with-tcl' '--with-tclconfig=/usr/lib64' '--with-openssl' 
'--with-pam' '--with-gssapi' '--with-includes=/usr/include' 
'--with-libraries=/usr/lib64' '--enable-nls' '--enable-dtrace' 
'--with-uuid=e2fs' '--with-libxml' '--with-libxslt' '--with-ldap' 
'--with-selinux' '--with-systemd' '--with-system-tzdata=/usr/share/zoneinfo' 
'--sysconfdir=/etc/sysconfig/pgsql' '--docdir=/usr/pgsql-16/doc' 
'--htmldir=/usr/pgsql-16/doc/html' 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall 
-Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS 
-fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches 
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection' 
'LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed' 'LLVM_CONFIG=/usr/bin/llvm-config-64' 
'CLANG=/usr/bin/clang' 
'PKG_CONFIG_PATH=:/usr/lib64/pkgconfig:/usr/share/pkgconfig'
CC = gcc
CPPFLAGS = -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include
CFLAGS = -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith 
-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Werror=vla -Wendif-labels 
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3 -Wcast-function-type 
-Wshadow=compatible-local -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv 
-fexcess-precision=standard -Wno-format-truncation -Wno-stringop-truncation -O2 
-g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 
-Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong 
-grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
CFLAGS_SL = -fPIC
LDFLAGS = -Wl,--as-needed -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib64 -Wl,--as-needed 
-Wl,-rpath,'/usr/pgsql-16/lib',--enable-new-dtags
LDFLAGS_EX =
LDFLAGS_SL =
LIBS = -lpgcommon -lpgport -lselinux -lzstd -llz4 -lxslt -lxml2 -lpam -lssl 
-lcrypto -lgssapi_krb5 -lz -lreadline -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm
VERSION = PostgreSQL 16.8

From: Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2025 3:23 PM
To: Zechman, Derek S <derek.s.zech...@snapon.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: segmentation fault

"Zechman, Derek S" <Derek. S. Zechman@ snapon. com> writes: > We are getting a 
segmentation fault which seems to be specific to pg16 on redhat 8. Tested on 
pg14 and pg15 with no problems. Also tested with pg16 on redhat 9 - no issues. 
The


"Zechman, Derek S" 
<derek.s.zech...@snapon.com<mailto:derek.s.zech...@snapon.com>> writes:

> We are getting a segmentation fault which seems to be specific to pg16 on 
> redhat 8.  Tested on pg14 and pg15 with no problems.  Also tested with pg16 
> on redhat 9 - no issues.  The developer determined that it is specific to 
> select into a defined variable within a function.  We have a reproducible 
> test case that requires no data.  I determined that 2857 is the maximum 
> number that doesn't crash and anything higher than that causes a segfault.  
> Can anyone help with this problem?



FWIW, I cannot replicate this problem using this script.  Now I'm

testing v16 branch tip not 16.6, but a quick trawl through the git

history didn't find any plausibly-matching bug fixes since 16.6.



Where did you get your Postgres server executable from exactly,

and what options was it built with?  (The output of the matching

version of pg_config would answer that.)  Can you get a stack

trace from the crash?



https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Generating_a_stack_trace_of_a_PostgreSQL_backend__;!!Lf_9VycLqA!lHekhKzAMOJ0nurE4gyelvKXRrULtGMRcKK1c_skYs_MZphlwF859-tyK5-8UjeYq2uE1oJb5OLpUFxi4DOF$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Generating_a_stack_trace_of_a_PostgreSQL_backend__;!!Lf_9VycLqA!lHekhKzAMOJ0nurE4gyelvKXRrULtGMRcKK1c_skYs_MZphlwF859-tyK5-8UjeYq2uE1oJb5OLpUFxi4DOF$>



                                              regards, tom lane

Reply via email to