On Friday, April 11, 2025, Igor Korot <ikoro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, David, > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 9:04 PM David G. Johnston < > david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 6:49 PM Igor Korot <ikoro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, ALL, >>> On the https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-createindex.html# >>> SQL-CREATEINDEX-STORAGE-PARAMETERS >>> its said: >>> >>> [quote] >>> The optional WITH clause specifies storage parameters for the index. >>> Each index method has its own set of allowed storage parameters. The >>> B-tree, hash, GiST and SP-GiST index methods all accept this >>> parameter: >>> [/quote] >>> >>> >> These are the index methods and the valid lists for each. The docs are >> correct in how they remove duplication. I'm undecided on whether that is >> the best presentation choice. I would at minimum place a new paragraph >> after "own set of allowed storage parameters." so that "The B-tree, >> hash..." begins its own line. >> >
> This above looks much better. What stops you from pushing it? > > There is no double meaning and everything is split nicely. > Because I’m undecided on what exactly would be an improvement and don’t care enough on the basis of this single question to put effort into figuring that out. Committers read these and if one of them wants to act on my new paragraph suggestion great. If not, it isn’t that big a deal. For me, this doesn’t warrant a CF entry. David J.
