So you believe it's strictly an EBS issue? Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: Christophe Pettus <x...@thebuild.com> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 8:43:19 PM To: Eden Aharoni <ed...@legitsecurity.com> Cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RDS IO Read time
[You don't often get email from x...@thebuild.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > On Mar 31, 2025, at 10:32, Eden Aharoni <ed...@legitsecurity.com> wrote: > > First, thanks for the reply :) > So, I do know which part is taking a lot of IO time and it's to be honest any > node that reads from the disk.. of course, we're running EXPLAIN on our > queries (to be more specific we use auto_explain) but we can't seem to find > what could cause an index scan that reads 34 MB to take more than a second > (1.2 sec).. we do know that our dataset doesn't fit the memory and we were ok > with that but with IO being so slow we just don't know what to do anymore. > Any other suggestions other than contact AWS (which we did but it seems this > path won't lead anywhere). The performance of EBS is definitely a question for AWS. I can say that, in our experience, EBS mounts for RDS almost never approach the stated maximum throughput, although io2 tends to be closer than gp2 or gp3.