On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 at 18:22, Jan Behrens <jbe-ml...@magnetkern.de> wrote:
> Instead, I plan to expect the function to receive a query string that > will get the data that is being processed by the function. > > That query string should be allowed to refer to tables in the > search_path at the caller's side. > > Therefore, I cannot use the "SET search_path FROM CURRENT" in my > "CREATE FUNCTION" statement, because it would overwrite the current > search_path on each call of the function. > I wonder if it would help if EXECUTE took an optional search_path to use while executing the query.