On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 at 18:22, Jan Behrens <jbe-ml...@magnetkern.de> wrote:


> Instead, I plan to expect the function to receive a query string that
> will get the data that is being processed by the function.
>
> That query string should be allowed to refer to tables in the
> search_path at the caller's side.
>
> Therefore, I cannot use the "SET search_path FROM CURRENT" in my
> "CREATE FUNCTION" statement, because it would overwrite the current
> search_path on each call of the function.
>

 I wonder if it would help if EXECUTE took an optional search_path to use
while executing the query.

Reply via email to