On Sun, Nov 24, 2024 at 2:55 PM Christophe Pettus <x...@thebuild.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 2024, at 09:15, Ron Johnson <ronljohnso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Doesn't the existence of a replication slot force PG to retain WAL files > when replication is broken? > > It does. I don't recall if the OP said that they were using a persistent > replication slot or not; it's not as common with binary replication as with > logical replication. > Really? I wonder why people fight with configuring max_wal_size and wal_keep_size, when replication slots do all the work for you. -- Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce. Don't boil me, I'm still alive. <Redacted> lobster!
