Well, things did not work as I expected, which means there is more for me to
learn. I am new to RLS usage. I want to implement this in a proper manner, so
is the behavior described below correct? Are there other aspects of this I need
to study?
Thanks, in advance. Advice and links to articles are greatly appreciated.
- Mark
Here are two tests I ran using pg 12 (upgrade on the schedule).
Given a table “customer” with a column “deadfiled” with a default of false. If
deadfile is true, then exclude row from queries executed by role “staff”.
Test 1
CREATE POLICY filter_customer_deadfiled
ON public.customer
AS PERMISSIVE
FOR SELECT
TO staff
USING ((deadfiled IS NOT TRUE));
Select queries by staff do not include row where deadfiled is true. Update and
insert queries by staff on visible rows fail.
Test 2
CREATE POLICY filter_customer_deadfiled
ON public.customer
AS PERMISSIVE
FOR ALL
TO prm_staff
USING ((deadfiled IS NOT TRUE));
Select queries by staff do not include row where deadfiled is true. Update
insert queries by staff on visible rows succeed.
This indicates that policy using FOR ALL allows CRUD, but if the policy states
FOR SELECT then additional policies are needed for insert, update and delete.
> On Nov 13, 2024, at 6:13 PM, Mark Phillips <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you. I will revisit my test cases to be sure I have the use cases
> covered.
> - Mark, out and about.
>
>> On Nov 13, 2024, at 5:36 PM, David G. Johnston <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, November 13, 2024, Mark Phillips <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> Given a database table with one policy statement FOR SELECT applied, it is
>>> necessary to apply additional policy statements for insert, update, and
>>> delete operations?
>>
>> It isn’t necessary but most conventional use cases would involve
>> establishing policies for writing as well as reading. But it is use case
>> dependent.
>>
>> David J.
>>
