On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:28:44PM -0400, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> raf <postg...@raf.org> writes: > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 06:43:22PM -0700, "David G. Johnston" > > <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You specified “-1” so I don’t get why you believe pg_restore should be > >> continuing to execute in the face of the SQL error. > > > The reason I believe pg_restore should be continuing to execute in the face > > of > > the SQL error is because I didn't supply the -e option which is described > > thusly in the pg_restore manual entry: > > But you'd better also read the para about -1: > > -1 > --single-transaction > Execute the restore as a single transaction (that is, wrap the > emitted commands in BEGIN/COMMIT). This ensures that either all > the commands complete successfully, or no changes are > applied. This option implies --exit-on-error. > > regards, tom lane > Yes, I saw that. Many thanks. All good now. cheer, raf
