On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:47 PM Gavin Roy <gav...@aweber.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 3:15 PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnso...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> But why tar instead of custom? That was part of my original question. >> > > I've found it pretty useful for programmatically accessing data in a dump > for large databases outside of the normal pg_dump/pg_restore workflow. You > don't have to seek through one large binary file to get to the data section > to get at the data. > Interesting. Please explain, though, since a big tarball _is_ "one large binary file" that you have to sequentially scan. (I don't know the internal structure of custom format files, and whether they have file pointers to each table.) Is it because you need individual .dat "COPY" files for something other than loading into PG tables (since pg_restore --table=xxxx does that, too), and directory format archives can be inconvenient?
