On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 9:12 AM Greg Sabino Mullane <htamf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 6:19 AM Radu Radutiu <rradu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do you have any idea how to further debug the problem? >> > > Putting aside the issue of non-reclaimed memory for now, can you show us > the actual query? The explain analyze you provided shows it doing an awful > lot of joins and then returning 14+ million rows to the client. Surely the > client does not need that many rows? > And the query cost is really high. "Did you ANALYZE the instance after conversion?" was my first question.
