On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 6:58 PM jack <jack...@a7q.com> wrote: > But the current i9 machine is a machine from only 4 years ago which should > have no issues. > > That is a non sequitur. Besides, if the current code is a representative example you've probably given it the effective usage of 8 years.
Whether related or not to this error you really should be doing all those updates on a temporary or unlogged staging table and getting WAL generation out of the equation. David J.
