A little while ago this month, this was reported: https://www.spinics.net/lists/pgsql/msg219648.html
The issue was fixed for GDAL 3.6, but the same problem still exists for GDAL 3.7, which also needs to be rebuilt against armadillo 12 for rhel 8 (and possibly 9 as well?) This is what I get currently when I try to update my packages on AlmaLinux 8: $ sudo dnf update Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:08 ago on Tue 23 Jan 2024 04:16:31 PM PST. Error: Problem 1: package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both armadillo-12.6.6-1.el8.x86_64 from epel and armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64 from @System - cannot install the best update candidate for package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64 Problem 2: package gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires libgdal.so.33()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires gdal37-libs(x86-64) = 3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8, but none of the providers can be installed - package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from @System requires libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gdal37-libs-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from pgdg-common requires libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both armadillo-12.6.6-1.el8.x86_64 from epel and armadillo-10.8.2-1.el8.x86_64 from @System - package gdal36-libs-3.6.4-6PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 from pgdg-common requires libarmadillo.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package gdal37-devel-3.7.2-1PGDG.rhel8.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package gdal36-libs-3.6.4-5PGDG.rhel8.x86_64
