Dear PostgreSQL Community,

I am seeking guidance regarding a recurring issue we've encountered with
WAL segment removal during logical replication using pgoutput plugin. We
sporadically encounter an error indicating that a requested WAL segment has
already been removed. This issue arises intermittently when executing
START_REPLICATION. An example error message is as follows:


requested WAL segment 000000010000146000000AE has already been removed


Please note that this error is not specific to the segment mentioned above;
it serves as an example of the type of error we are experiencing.

Additional Context:


   -

   max_slot_wal_keep_size is -1, logical_decoding_work_mem is 4 GB.
   -

   The error seems to appear randomly and is not consistent.
   -

   After a couple of retries, the replication process eventually succeeds.
   -

   For one of the users it seems to be happening every 16 hours or so.


Our approach involves starting with START_REPLICATION 0, replicating data
in batches, and then restarting at the last LSN of the previous batch. We
are trying to understand the root cause behind the intermittent removal of
WAL segments during logical replication. Specifically, we are looking for
insights into:


   -

   The potential reasons for the WAL segments being reported as removed.
   -

   Why this error occurs intermittently and why replication succeeds after
   several retries.
   -

   Any advice on troubleshooting and resolving this issue, or insights into
   whether it might be related to our specific replication setup or a
   characteristic of pgoutput, would be highly valuable.


Related Posts


   -

   https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DBZ-590
   -

   Troubleshooting Postgres Sources | Airbyte Documentation
   
<https://docs.airbyte.com/integrations/sources/postgres/postgres-troubleshooting#under-cdc-incremental-mode-there-are-still-full-refresh-syncs>
   -


   
https://fivetran.com/docs/databases/postgresql/troubleshooting/last-tracked-lsn-error



Thank you very much for your time and assistance.

Thanks,

Kaushik Iska

Reply via email to