> On Dec 25, 2023, at 10:44, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote: > Functions with same name in different schemas would need to be dealt with. I think that's the primary use-case (at least, it would be for me), and I don't see a convenient way of doing that. Even a "get OID of current function" function would be useful here.
- Re: Changing a schema's name with function1 calling func... Adrian Klaver
- Re: Re: Changing a schema's name with function1 cal... Wilma Wantren
- Re: Changing a schema's name with function1 cal... Adrian Klaver
- Re: Re: Changing a schema's name with funct... Wilma Wantren
- Re: Changing a schema's name with funct... Adrian Klaver
- Re: Changing a schema's name with ... Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Changing a schema's name with ... Adrian Klaver
- Re: Changing a schema's name with ... Peter J. Holzer
- Re: Re: Changing a schema's name w... Wilma Wantren
- Re: Changing a schema's name with ... Adrian Klaver
- Re: Changing a schema's name with ... Christophe Pettus
- Re: Changing a schema's name with ... Kirk Wolak
- Re: Changing a schema's name with ... Adrian Klaver
- Re: Re: Changing a schema's name w... Wilma Wantren
- Re: Changing a schema's name with ... Adrian Klaver
- Re: Re: Changing a schema's name w... Wilma Wantren