Greetings, On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 20:08 Abhishek Bhola <abhishek.bh...@japannext.co.jp> wrote:
> As said above, I tested pgBackRest on my bigger DB and here are the > results. > Server on which this is running has the following config: > Architecture: x86_64 > CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit > Byte Order: Little Endian > CPU(s): 36 > On-line CPU(s) list: 0-35 > Thread(s) per core: 1 > Core(s) per socket: 18 > Socket(s): 2 > NUMA node(s): 2 > > Data folder size: 52 TB (has some duplicate files since it is restored > from tapes) > Backup is being written on to DELL Storage, mounted on the server. > > pgbackrest.conf with following options enabled > repo1-block=y > repo1-bundle=y > start-fast=y > Thanks for sharing! Did you perhaps consider using zstd for the compression..? You might find that you get similar compression in less time. Thanks. Stephen
