Hi, I wanted to create an exclusion constraint like
EXCLUDE (c1 WITH =, c2 with <>) This gives an error: operator <>(integer,integer) is not a member of operator family "integer_ops" I can resolve that by using gist and the btree_gist extension. My question is can I somehow express something like EXCLUDE (c1 WITH =, c2 with NOT =) It seems that's not possible at the moment. But is there any obstacle in principle or is it just not implemented? We have a ton of overlap operators (geometric, ranges, arrays) but none for the opposite. Sometimes that's useful for exclusion constraints. Thanks, Torsten
