Hello,
In many case a formal writing and usage of with statement could solve the
issue.
If you need join, use always join:
where T_POV2.RSNO = T_CUST.RSNO
and T_POV2.KNO = T_CUST.KNO
and T_POV2.GSTSEQ = T_CUST.GSTSEQ)
this is an inner join.

I mean something like this
with t_pov2 as (
select T_CUST.RSNO ,
T_CUST.KNO ,
MIN(T_CUST.GSTSEQ) GSTSEQ
from TBL_CUST T_CUST ,
TBL_POV T_POV ,
TBL_RES T_RES
where T_CUST.STSFLG = 'T'
and T_CUST.DISPSEQ <> 9999
AND T_CUST.KFIX = '0'
and T_POV.CRSNO = T_RES.CRSNO
and T_RES.RSNO = T_CUST.RSNO
group by T_CUST.RSNO , T_CUST.KNO
), t_pov3 as (
select T_CUST.RSNO RSNO2 ,
T_CUST.KNO ,
T_CUST.AGE ,
T_CUST.GST
from TBL_CUST T_CUST
inner join t_pov2 on T_POV2.RSNO = T_CUST.RSNO
and T_POV2.KNO = T_CUST.KNO
and T_POV2.GSTSEQ = T_CUST.GSTSEQ
)

select *
from TBL_RES
left outer join t_pov3 on TBL_RES.RSNO = T_POV3.RSNO2
and TBL_RES.KNO = T_POV3.KNO
where TBL_RES.CID >= to_date('2022/07/01', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
and TBL_RES.CID <= to_date('2022/07/31', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
and TBL_RES.COD >= to_date('2022/07/01', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
and TBL_RES.COD <= to_date('2022/07/31', 'YYYY/MM/DD')

but if tbl_res contain lessere record a good idea is start from this table
and use in join with other


Il giorno lun 5 giu 2023 alle ore 08:57 gzh <gzhco...@126.com> ha scritto:

> Hi everyone,
> I'm running into some performance issues with my SQL query.
> The following SQL query is taking a long time to execute.
>
> Execution Plan:
> explain analyse
> select * from TBL_RES
> left outer join(select T_CUST.RSNO RSNO2 ,
> T_CUST.KNO ,
> T_CUST.AGE ,
> T_CUST.GST
> from TBL_CUST T_CUST ,
> (select T_CUST.RSNO ,
> T_CUST.KNO ,
> MIN(T_CUST.GSTSEQ) GSTSEQ
> from TBL_CUST T_CUST ,
> TBL_POV T_POV ,
> TBL_RES T_RES
> where T_CUST.STSFLG = 'T'
> and T_CUST.DISPSEQ <> 9999
> AND T_CUST.KFIX = '0'
> and T_POV.CRSNO = T_RES.CRSNO
> and T_RES.RSNO = T_CUST.RSNO
> group by T_CUST.RSNO , T_CUST.KNO) T_POV2
> where T_POV2.RSNO = T_CUST.RSNO
> and T_POV2.KNO = T_CUST.KNO
> and T_POV2.GSTSEQ = T_CUST.GSTSEQ) T_POV3 on TBL_RES.RSNO = T_POV3.RSNO2
> and TBL_RES.KNO = T_POV3.KNO
> where TBL_RES.CID >= to_date('2022/07/01', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
> and TBL_RES.CID <= to_date('2022/07/31', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
> and TBL_RES.COD >= to_date('2022/07/01', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
> and TBL_RES.COD <= to_date('2022/07/31', 'YYYY/MM/DD')
> ----- Execution Plan -----
> Nested Loop Left Join  (cost=254388.44..452544.70 rows=473 width=3545)
> (actual time=3077.312..996048.714 rows=15123 loops=1)
>   Join Filter: ((TBL_RES.RSNO = T_CUST.RSNO) AND ((TBL_RES.KNO)::text =
> (T_CUST.KNO)::text))
>   Rows Removed by Join Filter: 4992268642
>   ->  Gather  (cost=1000.00..58424.35 rows=473 width=3489) (actual
> time=0.684..14.158 rows=15123 loops=1)
>         Workers Planned: 2
>         Workers Launched: 2
>         ->  Parallel Seq Scan on TBL_RES  (cost=0.00..57377.05 rows=197
> width=3489) (actual time=0.096..279.504 rows=5041 loops=3)
>               Filter: ((CID >= to_date('2022/07/01'::text,
> 'YYYY/MM/DD'::text)) AND (CID <= to_date('2022/07/31'::text,
> 'YYYY/MM/DD'::text)) AND (COD >= to_date('2022/07/01'::text,
> 'YYYY/MM/DD'::text)) AND (COD <= to_date('2022/07/31'::text,
> 'YYYY/MM/DD'::text)))
>               Rows Removed by Filter: 161714
>   ->  Materialize  (cost=253388.44..394112.08 rows=1 width=56) (actual
> time=0.081..26.426 rows=330111 loops=15123)
>         ->  Hash Join  (cost=253388.44..394112.07 rows=1 width=56) (actual
> time=1197.484..2954.084 rows=330111 loops=1)
>               Hash Cond: ((T_CUST.RSNO = T_CUST_1.RSNO) AND
> ((T_CUST.KNO)::text = (T_CUST_1.KNO)::text) AND (T_CUST.gstseq =
> (min(T_CUST_1.gstseq))))
>               ->  Seq Scan on TBL_CUST T_CUST  (cost=0.00..79431.15
> rows=2000315 width=61) (actual time=0.015..561.005 rows=2000752 loops=1)
>               ->  Hash  (cost=246230.90..246230.90 rows=262488 width=50)
> (actual time=1197.025..1209.957 rows=330111 loops=1)
>                     Buckets: 65536  Batches: 8  Memory Usage: 2773kB
>                     ->  Finalize GroupAggregate
> (cost=205244.84..243606.02 rows=262488 width=50) (actual
> time=788.552..1116.074 rows=330111 loops=1)
>                           Group Key: T_CUST_1.RSNO, T_CUST_1.KNO
>                           ->  Gather Merge  (cost=205244.84..238964.80
> rows=268846 width=50) (actual time=788.547..982.479 rows=330111 loops=1)
>                                 Workers Planned: 2
>                                 Workers Launched: 1
>                                 ->  Partial GroupAggregate
> (cost=204244.81..206933.27 rows=134423 width=50) (actual
> time=784.032..900.979 rows=165056 loops=2)
>                                       Group Key: T_CUST_1.RSNO,
> T_CUST_1.KNO
>                                       ->  Sort  (cost=204244.81..204580.87
> rows=134423 width=23) (actual time=784.019..833.791 rows=165061 loops=2)
>                                             Sort Key: T_CUST_1.RSNO,
> T_CUST_1.KNO
>                                             Sort Method: external merge
> Disk: 5480kB
>                                             Worker 0:  Sort Method:
> external merge  Disk: 5520kB
>                                             ->  Parallel Hash Join
> (cost=111758.80..190036.38 rows=134423 width=23) (actual
> time=645.302..716.247 rows=165061 loops=2)
>                                                   Hash Cond:
> (T_CUST_1.RSNO = T_RES.RSNO)
>                                                   ->  Parallel Seq Scan on
> TBL_CUST T_CUST_1  (cost=0.00..74013.63 rows=204760 width=23) (actual
> time=0.018..264.390 rows=165058 loops=2)
>                                                         Filter: ((dispseq
> <> '9999'::numeric) AND ((stsflg)::text = 'T'::text) AND ((KFIX)::text =
> '0'::text))
>                                                         Rows Removed by
> Filter: 835318
>                                                   ->  Parallel Hash
> (cost=109508.52..109508.52 rows=137142 width=8) (actual
> time=343.593..343.896 rows=165058 loops=2)
>                                                         Buckets: 131072
> Batches: 8  Memory Usage: 3008kB
>                                                         ->  Parallel Hash
> Join  (cost=51834.70..109508.52 rows=137142 width=8) (actual
> time=256.732..314.368 rows=165058 loops=2)
>                                                               Hash Cond:
> ((T_RES.crsno)::text = (T_POV.crsno)::text)
>                                                               ->  Parallel
> Seq Scan on TBL_RES T_RES  (cost=0.00..53199.02 rows=208902 width=17)
> (actual time=0.007..100.510 rows=250132 loops=2)
>                                                               ->  Parallel
> Hash  (cost=49450.42..49450.42 rows=137142 width=9) (actual
> time=122.308..122.309 rows=165054 loops=2)
>
> Buckets: 131072  Batches: 8  Memory Usage: 2976kB
>                                                                     ->
> Parallel Seq Scan on TBL_POV T_POV  (cost=0.00..49450.42 rows=137142
> width=9) (actual time=0.037..89.470 rows=165054 loops=2)
> Planning Time: 1.064 ms
> Execution Time: 996062.382 ms
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The amount of data in the table is as follows.
> TBL_RES    500265
> TBL_CUST   2000752
> TBL_POV    330109
>
> Any suggestions for improving the performance of the query would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>

-- 
Domenico L.

per stupire mezz'ora basta un libro di storia,
io cercai di imparare la Treccani a memoria... [F.d.A.]

Reply via email to