Re: Regarding SSL Enablement in PostgreSQL Database on different port

[Christophe Pettus]

> On May 2, 2023, at 12:15, Tomas Pospisek <t...@sourcepole.ch> wrote:
> 
> Oh, I think your idea to use pgbouncer to take care of the SSL termination is 
> elegant. I don't think me I'd characterize it as a hack if properly set up. 
> Why do you consider it a hack?

It's really only a hack in the sense that pgbouncer is being introduced just to 
do TLS.  You might be able to do the same thing by running stunnel on the 
PostgreSQL host on a different port, and have it forward to PostgreSQL.