On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 7:51 PM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 12:40, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Ben Clements <benhasgonewalk...@gmail.com> writes:
> > > As shown above, the following calculated column can bring in the city
> name,
> > > even though the city name isn't in the GROUP BY:
> > >    max(city) keep (dense_rank first order by population desc)
> >
> > You haven't really explained what this does, let alone why it can't
> > be implemented with existing features such as FILTER and ORDER BY.
>
> (It wasn't clear to me until I watched the youtube video.)


> Likely KEEP is more flexible than just the given example but I think
> that something similar to the example given could be done by inventing
> a TOP() and BOTTOM() aggregate. Then you could write something like:
>
> select
>    country,
>    count(*),
>    max(population),
>    bottom(city, population)
> from
>    cities
> group by
>    country
> having
>    count(*) > 1
>
> the transfn for bottom() would need to remember the city and the
> population for the highest yet seen value of the 2nd arg.


BOTTOM() remembers the highest value?


> Where this wouldn't work would be if multiple columns were
> required to tiebreak the sort.
>

TOP(city, ROW(population, land_area)) ?

I'd assume since the whole thing can be done with
> a subquery that the entire point of having special syntax for this
> would be because we don't want to pay the price of looking at the
> table twice, i.e. performance must matter, so the ability to have
> parallel aggregates here seems good.
>

SELECT country, city,
  rank() over (partition by country order by population desc),
  count() OVER (partition by country)
FROM cities
WINDOW_HAVING count > 0 AND rank = 1;

That would be, IMO, the idiomatic query form to perform ranking - not
abusing GROUP BY.  To add this encourages abusing GROUP BY.

Though I suppose if there is a sufficient performance gain to be had under
GROUP BY the effort might make sense if further improvements to window
function processing cannot be found.

David J.

Reply via email to